
iPhone SE 3 vs Galaxy A36
It’s Apple against Samsung in the midrange smartphone class, and the iPhone SE 3 and the Galaxy A36 are the models carrying each flag. The data doesn’t leave much room for doubt: 4 of 4 areas go to the Galaxy A36, and the gap is widest in display.
At a glance
- Display Galaxy A36 wins
- Performance Galaxy A36 wins
- Memory & Storage Galaxy A36 wins
- Camera Galaxy A36 wins
- Price Galaxy A36 wins
- Display0.0
- Camera0.0
- Display8.5
- Camera6.7
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The Galaxy A36 has a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz
If refresh rate is one of your priorities, this settles it: the Galaxy A36 leads clearly with 120 Hz to the iPhone SE 3’s 60 Hz. You notice refresh rate every time you scroll a feed or a web page, which is why the Galaxy A36 feels more fluid in everyday use.
-
The iPhone SE 3 has a 1.80 oz lighter build
The numbers aren’t close. The iPhone SE 3 lists 5.08 oz for weight, while the Galaxy A36 lists 6.88 oz. The iPhone SE 3 is easier on your wrist during long reading or gaming sessions.
-
The Galaxy A36 has 204% higher peak brightness
A clear win for the Galaxy A36: 1,900 nits against 625 nits. Few specs in this matchup are as one-sided. Peak brightness decides how readable the screen stays in direct sunlight and how punchy HDR content looks.
-
The Galaxy A36 has 128 GB of base storage instead of 64 GB
Here the Galaxy A36 pulls well ahead of the iPhone SE 3, with 128 GB compared to 64 GB. If you shoot a lot of video or keep music and maps offline, base storage is one of the specs you’ll feel most over the years.
-
The Galaxy A36 has a higher-resolution 50 MP main camera
The Galaxy A36 doesn’t just edge this one; 50 MP against 12 MP is a lead you’ll feel. Megapixels are only one part of image quality, so treat this as a sign of detail potential, not a verdict on photos.
Design & Size
- iPhone SE 3 5.45 in × 2.65 in × 0.29 in
- Galaxy A36 6.41 in × 3.08 in × 0.29 in
Size-wise, the Galaxy A36 takes up more space, and the iPhone SE 3 is easier to fit where room is tight. There’s 1.80 oz between them, and the iPhone SE 3 is on the lighter side.
Design & Build
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Height | 5.45 in | 6.41 in |
| Width | 2.65 in | 3.08 in |
| Thickness | 0.29 in Slimmest in class | 0.29 in |
| Weight | 5.08 oz (winner) Lightest in class | 6.88 oz |
| Water & dust rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Frame | Aluminum | N/A (not specified) |
Display
Galaxy A36 leads
The Galaxy A36 wins the display section decisively. The Galaxy A36 wins here with a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. Smoother motion is one of the most visible display upgrades, and adaptive high-refresh panels can slow down on static content to save power. That makes the Galaxy A36 the natural choice for buyers focused on display.
Refresh rate
iPhone SE 3: 60 Hz Galaxy A36: 120 Hz A higher refresh rate makes scrolling, animations and games look smoother. Once you’re used to it, a lower-rate screen can feel sluggish by comparison.
Peak brightness
iPhone SE 3: 625 nits Galaxy A36: 1,900 nits Peak figures are usually reached only in short bursts or small areas of the screen, but a higher ceiling still helps outdoor visibility.
Performance
Galaxy A36 leads
The Galaxy A36 takes performance by a nose. The Galaxy A36 comes with a newer 4 nm chip process. The Galaxy A36’s chip is built on a more advanced process. That usually points to efficiency gains, though chip design matters just as much. If this section decides it for you, choose the Galaxy A36.
CPU cores
iPhone SE 3: 6 Galaxy A36: 8 Core count on its own says little about speed; how the chip is designed and how fast each core runs matter more.
Process node
iPhone SE 3: 5 nm Galaxy A36: 4 nm Process numbers are partly marketing labels these days, so read this as a hint about efficiency rather than a verdict.
Memory & Storage
Galaxy A36 leads
On memory & storage, the gap between these two is wide, and it favors the Galaxy A36. Here the Galaxy A36 offers 128 GB of base storage instead of 64 GB. Base storage is what you get without paying extra. Photos, videos and apps add up quickly, so more space at the entry price is real value. The memory & storage verdict goes to the Galaxy A36.
Base storage
iPhone SE 3: 64 GB Galaxy A36: 128 GB The Galaxy A36 starts with more room, which means fewer “storage full” warnings and less time deleting old videos.
Camera
Galaxy A36 leads
The Galaxy A36 is the clear pick if camera is what you care about most. The Galaxy A36 stands out with a higher-resolution 50 MP main camera. More megapixels on the main camera allow bigger crops and more detail in good light, but sensor size and processing matter just as much. For anyone who cares most about camera, the Galaxy A36 is the safer choice.
Main camera
iPhone SE 3: 12 MP Galaxy A36: 50 MP The Galaxy A36’s higher-resolution main sensor gives you more room to crop, which helps when you can’t get closer.
Rear cameras
iPhone SE 3: 1 Galaxy A36: 3 The count alone doesn’t guarantee quality, but the Galaxy A36 gives you more lenses to choose from.
Battery & Charging
This section is descriptive. The iPhone SE 3 and the Galaxy A36 list different components for battery & charging, and the table spells them out.
Software & Updates
The iPhone SE 3 and the Galaxy A36 differ on software & updates in ways that are described rather than measured. The table has the details.
Full Specifications
Display
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 4.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Panel type | LCD (Retina HD) | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1334 x 750 | 2340 x 1080 |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi Lowest pixel density | N/A (not specified) |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz (winner) |
| Peak brightness | 625 nits Dimmest screen in class | 1,900 nits (winner) |
| Always-on display | No | Yes (winner) |
Performance
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | A15 Bionic | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| CPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| Process node | 5 nm | 4 nm (winner) |
Memory & Storage
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Base storage | 64 GB Least base storage | 128 GB (winner) |
| Max storage | 256 GB | N/A (not specified) |
| microSD slot | No | No |
Camera
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 12 MP Lowest-res main camera | 50 MP (winner) |
| Ultra-wide camera | N/A (not specified) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 (winner) |
| Front camera | 7 MP Lowest-res selfie camera | 12 MP (winner) |
| Max video | 4K60 | N/A (not specified) |
Battery & Charging
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | N/A (not specified) | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated video playbackManufacturer rating | 15 h Shortest rated playback | N/A (not specified) |
| Wired charging | N/A (not specified) | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 8 W | N/A (not specified) |
| Port | Lightning | USB-C |
Software & Updates
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | iOS 15.4 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| Promised OS updatesManufacturer commitment | N/A (not specified) | 6 years |
Design & Build
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Height | 5.45 in | 6.41 in |
| Width | 2.65 in | 3.08 in |
| Thickness | 0.29 in Slimmest in class | 0.29 in |
| Weight | 5.08 oz (winner) Lightest in class | 6.88 oz |
| Water & dust rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Frame | Aluminum | N/A (not specified) |
Price
| Spec | iPhone SE 3 | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch price | $429 | $400 (winner) |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Price & Value
The launch prices are close, with the Galaxy A36 just $29 below the iPhone SE 3. The Galaxy A36 delivers more for less: $29 less, to be exact.
Launch prices in the US as of March 2025; street prices move, so check before you buy.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the iPhone SE 3 if…
- you want the lighter phone (5.08 oz vs 6.88 oz)
- you want the more compact phone
- you’re comfortable with how Apple does things
Choose the Galaxy A36 if…
- you game or scroll a lot and like motion to look fluid (120 Hz vs 60 Hz)
- you use your phone outdoors a lot (1,900 nits vs 625 nits peak brightness)
- you shoot a lot of photos and video (128 GB vs 64 GB base storage)
- you like to crop into your photos (50 MP vs 12 MP main camera)
- you’d put the $29 saving toward something else
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for most people, the iPhone SE 3 or the Galaxy A36?
The Galaxy A36 makes more sense overall. Consider the alternative only if what you want most is a 1.80 oz lighter build.
Is the iPhone SE 3 bigger than the Galaxy A36?
The Galaxy A36 takes that one. With dimensions of 6.41 × 3.08 × 0.29 in, it is larger than the iPhone SE 3 (5.45 × 2.65 × 0.29 in).
Does the iPhone SE 3 perform better than the Galaxy A36?
Going by the specs, the Galaxy A36 comes out ahead: it offers a newer 4 nm chip process.
Which has the better camera, the iPhone SE 3 or the Galaxy A36?
The Galaxy A36 has the edge for photography, offering a higher-resolution 50 MP main camera and an extra rear camera.
Which has the better screen, the iPhone SE 3 or the Galaxy A36?
On display specs, the Galaxy A36 leads thanks to a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz and 204% higher peak brightness.
Which costs less, the iPhone SE 3 or the Galaxy A36?
At launch, the Galaxy A36 undercut the iPhone SE 3 by $29. These figures are as of March 2025, and street prices can change.
Executive Summary
On paper, the iPhone SE 3 and the Galaxy A36 chase the same buyer. In the details, Apple and Samsung made different calls. Practically speaking, the Galaxy A36’s biggest advantage is a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. Beyond that, 128 GB of base storage instead of 64 GB gives the Galaxy A36 another edge. On the other side, the iPhone SE 3 brings a 1.80 oz lighter build, and I wouldn’t dismiss that.
Your priorities do the choosing here: portability points to the iPhone SE 3, display to the Galaxy A36.
My pick: the Galaxy A36 gets my vote, but the iPhone SE 3 is the right call if your top priority is a 1.80 oz lighter build.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

