BEATSPowerbeats Pro 2
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 2025 · from $250 · Premium Wireless Earbuds
BOSEQuietComfort UltraEarbuds (2nd Gen)
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) 2025 · from $299 · Premium Wireless Earbuds

Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)

Both the Powerbeats Pro 2 and the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) sit in the premium wireless earbuds class, and Beats and Bose are clearly watching each other. The spec sheets tilt toward the Powerbeats Pro 2, which leads in 2 of 3 areas and opens its biggest gap on battery & charging.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Sound & Noise Cancelling Tie
  • Battery & Charging Powerbeats Pro 2 wins
  • Features & Connectivity Powerbeats Pro 2 wins
  • Price Powerbeats Pro 2 wins
Powerbeats Pro 2 Spec score by area
  • Sound & Noise Cancelling10.0
  • Battery & Charging8.2
QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) Spec score by area
  • Sound & Noise Cancelling10.0
  • Battery & Charging3.0

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The Powerbeats Pro 2 has 2 h more listening per charge

    If battery (single charge) is one of your priorities, this settles it: the Powerbeats Pro 2 leads clearly with 8 h to the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)’s 6 h. Longer listening per charge matters on long flights, workdays and road trips.

  2. The Powerbeats Pro 2 has 12 h more total battery with the case

    The numbers aren’t close. The Powerbeats Pro 2 lists 36 h for battery (with case), while the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) lists 24 h. The Powerbeats Pro 2’s case holds more extra charge, which is handy on trips.

  3. The Powerbeats Pro 2 has built-in heart-rate sensing

    The Powerbeats Pro 2 brings built-in heart-rate sensing, and the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) has no equivalent. The Powerbeats Pro 2 can measure your heart rate during exercise; the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) leaves that to other devices.

Design & Size

Fit & Build
Fit & Build: Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
SpecPowerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
Form factor Ear-hook In-ear with stability bands
Water resistance IPX4 IPX4
Weight (per earbud / headset) 0.31 oz Heaviest in class N/A (not specified)
Case weight 2.43 oz N/A (not specified)

Sound & Noise Cancelling

Too close to call

The differences on sound & noise cancelling are small enough to ignore in daily use. Bottom line for sound & noise cancelling: it’s a wash.

Battery & Charging

Powerbeats Pro 2 leads

The QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) has a tough time in the battery & charging section, where the Powerbeats Pro 2 pulls well ahead. The Powerbeats Pro 2 adds 2 h more listening per charge. Ratings usually assume moderate volume and specific settings, so real results vary. That makes the Powerbeats Pro 2 the natural choice for buyers focused on battery & charging.

Battery (single charge)

Powerbeats Pro 2: 8 h (winner)
QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): 6 h

Battery (with case)

Powerbeats Pro 2: 36 h (winner)
QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): 24 h
Powerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)

Battery (single charge)

Powerbeats Pro 2: 8 h QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): 6 h The Powerbeats Pro 2 runs longer before needing a break, so you’re less likely to be interrupted mid-podcast.

Battery (with case)

Powerbeats Pro 2: 36 h QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): 24 h Total battery with the case tells you how long you can go before plugging anything in.

Features & Connectivity

Powerbeats Pro 2 leads

The Powerbeats Pro 2 does a little better in the features & connectivity section, though nothing here is a deal-breaker for the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen). In its favor, the Powerbeats Pro 2 has built-in heart-rate sensing. If you already wear a fitness tracker, this feature is a nice extra rather than a must-have. So if features & connectivity tops your list, lean toward the Powerbeats Pro 2.

Heart-rate sensing

Powerbeats Pro 2: yes QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): no Built-in heart-rate sensing lets you track workouts without wearing a watch or chest strap.

Full Specifications

Sound & Noise Cancelling
Sound & Noise Cancelling: Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
SpecPowerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
Active noise cancelling Yes Yes
Transparency mode Yes Yes
Spatial audio Personalized Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking Bose Immersive Audio (with head tracking)
Bluetooth codecs N/A (not specified) SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Battery & Charging
Battery & Charging: Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
SpecPowerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
Battery (single charge)Manufacturer rating, ANC on where available 8 h (winner) 6 h
Battery (with case)Manufacturer rating 36 h (winner) Most total battery 24 h
Wireless charging Yes Yes
Charging port USB-C USB-C
Features & Connectivity
Features & Connectivity: Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
SpecPowerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
Bluetooth Class 1 Bluetooth (Apple H2 chip) Bluetooth 5.3
Multipoint N/A (not specified) Yes
Heart-rate sensing Yes (winner) No
Controls Physical button + volume rocker on each earbud Touch (tap and swipe)
Fit & Build
Fit & Build: Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
SpecPowerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
Form factor Ear-hook In-ear with stability bands
Water resistance IPX4 IPX4
Weight (per earbud / headset) 0.31 oz Heaviest in class N/A (not specified)
Case weight 2.43 oz N/A (not specified)
Price
Price: Powerbeats Pro 2 vs QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
SpecPowerbeats Pro 2QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
Launch price $250 (winner) $299

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Price & Value

Powerbeats Pro 2 $250 US launch MSRP
QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) $299 US launch MSRP

With just $49 between them at launch, the Powerbeats Pro 2 and the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) are priced as near equals. Save $49 and get the stronger spec sheet? That’s the deal the Powerbeats Pro 2 offers.

Launch prices in the US as of June 2025; street prices move, so check before you buy.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the Powerbeats Pro 2 if…

  • you want longer listening per charge (8 h vs 6 h)
  • you travel a lot and rarely want to charge the case (36 h vs 24 h)
  • you want built-in heart-rate sensing
  • you’d put the $49 saving toward something else
Powerbeats Pro 2 specs & rivals

Choose the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) if…

  • you already use other Bose products
QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for most people, the Powerbeats Pro 2 or the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)?

On the specs compared here, the Powerbeats Pro 2 makes more sense for most buyers; the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) doesn’t win a single measurable area.

Does the Powerbeats Pro 2 last longer on a charge than the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)?

The Powerbeats Pro 2 comes out ahead on battery (single charge), with 8 h compared with 6 h on the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen).

Which costs less, the Powerbeats Pro 2 or the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)?

At launch, the Powerbeats Pro 2 undercut the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) by $49. These figures are as of June 2025, and street prices can change.

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

Beats makes the Powerbeats Pro 2, Bose makes the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen), and both want the same spot on your shortlist. Here’s where I land. What I like most about the Powerbeats Pro 2 here is 2 h more listening per charge. There’s a bonus as well: the Powerbeats Pro 2 has built-in heart-rate sensing.

Choose by what you’d use most: battery & charging leads to the Powerbeats Pro 2, the things a spec sheet can’t capture leads to the QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen).

My pick: the Powerbeats Pro 2.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Beats or Bose. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: