Chevrolet Trailblazer front view
Chevrolet Trailblazer 2025 · from $23,100 · Subcompact SUV
Photo: Just a Man via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 4.0
Nissan Kicks front view
Nissan Kicks 2025 · from $21,830 · Subcompact SUV
Photo: Autosdeprimera via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 3.0

Trailblazer vs Kicks

For subcompact suv shoppers, the Trailblazer from Chevrolet and the Kicks from Nissan are two of the obvious candidates. On balance, the Kicks is the stronger package: it leads in 2 out of 5 areas, most clearly in space & practicality.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Engine & Performance Trailblazer wins
  • Fuel Economy & Range Trade-off
  • Space & Practicality Kicks wins
  • Off-road & Towing Tie
  • Safety & Tech Kicks wins
  • Price Kicks wins
Trailblazer spec score: 3.7 out of 103.7
Trailblazer Spec score
  • Engine & Performance1.8
  • Fuel Economy & Range2.8
  • Space & Practicality6.3
Kicks spec score: 4.9 out of 104.9
Kicks Spec score
  • Engine & Performance1.3
  • Fuel Economy & Range3.4
  • Space & Practicality9.5
Spec scores by area: Engine & Performance: Trailblazer 1.8, Kicks 1.3; Fuel Economy & Range: Trailblazer 2.8, Kicks 3.4; Space & Practicality: Trailblazer 6.3, Kicks 9.5Engine & PerformanceFuel Economy & RangeSpace & Practicality

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The Kicks has 19% more cargo space

    A clear win for the Kicks: 30 cu ft against 25.3 cu ft. Few specs in this matchup are as one-sided. The Kicks’s larger cargo area makes family trips and big shopping runs easier.

  2. The Trailblazer has 22 lb-ft more torque

    Here the Trailblazer pulls well ahead of the Kicks, with 162 lb-ft compared to 140 lb-ft. Electrified powertrains deliver torque instantly, so compare torque figures alongside the powertrain type.

  3. The Kicks has 10% more maximum cargo space

    The Trailblazer isn’t far behind at 54.4 cu ft, but the Kicks’s 60 cu ft still comes out ahead. Check the shape of the load floor too: a flat floor can matter as much as the number.

  4. The Kicks has better highway fuel economy

    A narrow win for the Kicks. With 35 mpg to 31 mpg, it’s the kind of difference that adds up rather than stands out. Speed, wind and load affect highway use a lot, but the official rating is a fair comparison point.

  5. The Kicks has a bigger 12.3 in touchscreen

    Close, but not identical: the Kicks lists 12.3 in and the Trailblazer lists 11 in. A bigger touchscreen makes maps and phone mirroring easier to read at a glance.

Design & Size

Dimensionally, these two are near twins.

Dimensions
Dimensions: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Length 173.7 in 171.9 in
Width (no mirrors) N/A (not specified) 70.9 in
Height N/A (not specified) 64.2 in
Wheelbase 103.9 in 104.6 in
Curb weight (from) N/A (not specified) 2,987 lb

Engine & Performance

Trailblazer leads

Look at the engine & performance table and one name keeps coming out on top: the Trailblazer. The Trailblazer scores with 22 lb-ft more torque. The Trailblazer’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing. For engine & performance, the Trailblazer is the one to beat.

Total system output

Trailblazer: 137 hp
Kicks: 141 hp

Torque

Trailblazer: 162 lb-ft (winner)
Kicks: 140 lb-ft
TrailblazerKicks

Torque

Trailblazer: 162 lb-ft Kicks: 140 lb-ft More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades.

Fuel Economy & Range

Trade-off

Give the Trailblazer credit for better city fuel economy, and the Kicks credit for better highway fuel economy. If you’re torn on fuel economy & range, the other sections may help break the tie.

Fuel economy (combined)

Trailblazer: 30 mpg
Kicks: 31 mpg

Fuel economy (city)

Trailblazer: 30 mpg (winner)
Kicks: 28 mpg

Fuel economy (highway)

Trailblazer: 31 mpg
Kicks: 35 mpg (winner)

Fuel tank

Trailblazer: 13.2 gal
Kicks: 11.9 gal
TrailblazerKicks

Fuel economy (highway)

Trailblazer: 31 mpg Kicks: 35 mpg Highway fuel economy matters if you cover long distances at steady speeds.

Fuel economy (city)

Trailblazer: 30 mpg Kicks: 28 mpg City fuel economy matters most if your driving is mostly short trips, traffic and stop-and-go commutes.

Space & Practicality

Kicks leads

The space & practicality comparison is one-sided. The Kicks leads where it counts. The Kicks stands out with 19% more cargo space. Cargo figures are measured in different ways by different makers, so small gaps may not show in practice. In short, the Kicks is the better-equipped car for space & practicality.

Seats

Trailblazer: 5 seats
Kicks: 5 seats

Cargo (behind rear seats)

Trailblazer: 25.3 cu ft
Kicks: 30 cu ft (winner)

Cargo (seats folded)

Trailblazer: 54.4 cu ft
Kicks: 60 cu ft (winner)
TrailblazerKicks

Cargo (behind rear seats)

Trailblazer: 25.3 cu ft Kicks: 30 cu ft Cargo space behind the rear seats is what you use every day for groceries, strollers and luggage.

Cargo (seats folded)

Trailblazer: 54.4 cu ft Kicks: 60 cu ft The Kicks can swallow more with the seats down, which makes it more versatile for occasional big loads.

Off-road & Towing

Too close to call

The differences on off-road & towing are small enough to ignore in daily use. Either car will serve you equally well on off-road & towing.

Safety & Tech

Kicks leads

Slight edge to the Kicks on safety & tech. Most buyers could live happily with either. The Kicks has the edge with a bigger 12.3 in touchscreen. The Kicks’s larger display gives navigation and menus more room. Net result: the Kicks leads this part of the comparison.

Largest touchscreen

Trailblazer: 11 in
Kicks: 12.3 in (winner)
TrailblazerKicks

Largest touchscreen

Trailblazer: 11 in Kicks: 12.3 in Screen size isn’t everything (physical controls and software speed matter too), but bigger is easier to read.

Full Specifications

Engine & Performance
Engine & Performance: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Powertrain Gas Gas
Engine 1.2L turbo I3 2.0L I4
Total system output 137 hp 141 hp
Torque 162 lb-ft (winner) 140 lb-ft
Transmission CVT CVT (Xtronic)
Drivetrain FWD (AWD available) FWD (AWD available)
Fuel Economy & Range
Fuel Economy & Range: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available 30 mpg 31 mpg
Fuel economy (city) 30 mpg (winner) 28 mpg
Fuel economy (highway) 31 mpg 35 mpg (winner)
Fuel tank 13.2 gal 11.9 gal
Space & Practicality
Space & Practicality: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Cargo (behind rear seats) 25.3 cu ft 30 cu ft (winner) Biggest cargo area
Cargo (seats folded) 54.4 cu ft 60 cu ft (winner)
Rear legroom N/A (not specified) 34.50 in
Off-road & Towing
Off-road & Towing: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Ground clearance N/A (not specified) 8.40 in
AWD / 4WD available Yes Yes
Safety & Tech
Safety & Tech: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Largest touchscreen 11 in 12.3 in (winner)
Driver-assist suite Chevy Safety Assist N/A (not specified)
Basic warranty 3 yr / 36,000 mi 3 yr / 36,000 mi
Dimensions
Dimensions: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Length 173.7 in 171.9 in
Width (no mirrors) N/A (not specified) 70.9 in
Height N/A (not specified) 64.2 in
Wheelbase 103.9 in 104.6 in
Curb weight (from) N/A (not specified) 2,987 lb
Price
Price: Trailblazer vs Kicks
SpecTrailblazerKicks
Starting MSRP $23,100 $21,830 (winner)

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Price & Value

Trailblazer $23,100 LS FWD, excl. destination
Kicks $21,830 2025 Kicks S FWD launch MSRP, excl. destination

A price gap of $1,270 at launch won’t make or break this decision. Less money, more wins: the Kicks beats the Trailblazer on value by a clear margin and saves $1,270.

Launch prices in the US as of launch; street prices move, so check before you buy.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the Trailblazer if…

  • you want more pulling power from low speeds (162 lb-ft vs 140 lb-ft of torque)
  • you mostly drive in town (30 mpg vs 28 mpg in the city)
  • you prefer staying with Chevrolet
Trailblazer specs & rivals

Choose the Kicks if…

  • you want more cargo space behind the rear seats (30 cu ft vs 25.3 cu ft)
  • you move bulky items now and then (60 cu ft vs 54.4 cu ft maximum cargo)
  • you cover long highway distances (35 mpg vs 31 mpg on the highway)
  • you rely on navigation and phone mirroring on a larger display (12.3 in vs 11 in)
  • you want the lower price and can live with the trade-offs ($1,270 less)
Kicks specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I buy the Trailblazer or the Kicks?

For most people, the Kicks is the stronger choice, unless you’d rather have 22 lb-ft more torque on the Trailblazer.

Is the Trailblazer bigger than the Kicks?

They’re practically the same size. The difference between the Trailblazer and the Kicks is too small to matter.

Is the Trailblazer cheaper than the Kicks?

The Kicks is the cheaper option, launching at $1,270 less than the Trailblazer (launch prices as of launch).

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

Whenever Chevrolet and Nissan go head to head, I learn something about what each one cares about, and the Trailblazer and the Kicks are no exception. It’s hard to argue with 19% more cargo space, which is exactly what the Kicks brings. Another thing in the Kicks’s favor is better highway fuel economy. The Trailblazer does have a strong card to play: 22 lb-ft more torque.

For engine & performance, the Trailblazer fits better. For space & practicality, the Kicks is the better match.

My pick: I think most people will be happier with the Kicks, unless you need 22 lb-ft more torque, which only the Trailblazer offers.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Chevrolet or Nissan. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: