CR-V Hybrid vs Cherokee
Cross-brand comparisons are where priorities show. Honda’s CR-V Hybrid and Jeep’s Cherokee target the same compact suv space in different ways. Spec for spec, there isn’t much daylight between them, so small details and personal priorities will decide it.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance CR-V Hybrid wins
- Fuel Economy & Range CR-V Hybrid wins
- Space & Practicality Tie
- Off-road & Towing Tie
- Engine & Performance1.1
- Fuel Economy & Range9.7
- Engine & Performance1.0
- Fuel Economy & Range8.7
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The CR-V Hybrid has better fuel economy
The gap on fuel economy (combined) is slim (40 mpg against 37 mpg), yet it tips toward the CR-V Hybrid. The CR-V Hybrid uses less fuel on the standard combined cycle, which matters most if you drive a lot.
-
The CR-V Hybrid has 17 lb-ft more torque
You may not notice this one every day, but the CR-V Hybrid’s 247 lb-ft is a step ahead of the Cherokee’s 230 lb-ft. Electrified powertrains deliver torque instantly, so compare torque figures alongside the powertrain type.
-
The Cherokee has
Numbers like 113 in against 106.3 in only tell you which is larger (here, the Cherokee), not which is better. A shorter wheelbase can make a car more agile in tight turns and parking lots.
-
The CR-V Hybrid has better city fuel economy
Slight advantage to the CR-V Hybrid: 43 mpg compared with 39 mpg. In town, driving style has a big effect, but the CR-V Hybrid starts from a better baseline.
Design & Size
Dimensions
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Length | N/A (not specified) | 188 in |
| Width (no mirrors) | N/A (not specified) | 74.7 in |
| Height | N/A (not specified) | 67.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 113 in |
Engine & Performance
CR-V Hybrid leads
The CR-V Hybrid does a little better in the engine & performance section, though nothing here is a deal-breaker for the Cherokee. The CR-V Hybrid comes with 17 lb-ft more torque. More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades. Net result: the CR-V Hybrid leads this part of the comparison.
Torque
CR-V Hybrid: 247 lb-ft Cherokee: 230 lb-ft The CR-V Hybrid’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing.
Fuel Economy & Range
CR-V Hybrid leads
The CR-V Hybrid dominates the fuel economy & range section, and the gaps are large enough to matter in daily use. The CR-V Hybrid answers with better fuel economy. Official figures rarely match real-world driving exactly, but the ranking between two cars tends to hold. Anyone shopping mainly on fuel economy & range should start with the CR-V Hybrid.
Fuel economy (combined)
CR-V Hybrid: 40 mpg Cherokee: 37 mpg Better combined fuel economy lowers your running costs every week, and the savings add up over years of ownership.
Fuel economy (city)
CR-V Hybrid: 43 mpg Cherokee: 39 mpg City fuel economy matters most if your driving is mostly short trips, traffic and stop-and-go commutes.
Space & Practicality
Too close to call
The differences on space & practicality are small enough to ignore in daily use. The takeaway: space & practicality is not where these two differ.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
Swap one for the other and you’d lose nothing on off-road & towing. Neither car gives you a reason to choose it on off-road & towing.
Safety & Tech
The safety & tech entries below are descriptive rather than numeric. Read them side by side to see where the CR-V Hybrid and the Cherokee part ways.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Engine | 2.0L I4 two-motor hybrid | 1.6L turbo I4 hybrid (two electric motors) |
| Total system output | 204 hp | 210 hp |
| Torque | 247 lb-ft (winner) | 230 lb-ft |
| Transmission | eCVT | eCVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD (AWD available) | AWD |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available | 40 mpg (winner) Most efficient in class | 37 mpg |
| Fuel economy (city) | 43 mpg (winner) Best city economy | 39 mpg |
| Fuel economy (highway) | 36 mpg | 35 mpg |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Ground clearance | N/A (not specified) | 8 in |
| Max towing | N/A (not specified) | 3,500 lb |
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Largest touchscreen | N/A (not specified) | 12.3 in |
| Apple CarPlay / Android Auto | N/A (not specified) | Wireless Apple CarPlay & Android Auto |
| Driver-assist suite | Honda Sensing | N/A (not specified) |
| Basic warranty | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | 3 yr / 36,000 mi |
Dimensions
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Length | N/A (not specified) | 188 in |
| Width (no mirrors) | N/A (not specified) | 74.7 in |
| Height | N/A (not specified) | 67.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 113 in |
Price
| Spec | CR-V Hybrid | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | N/A (not specified) | $35,000 |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the CR-V Hybrid if…
- you drive a lot and want lower running costs (40 mpg vs 37 mpg combined)
- you often drive loaded up or with a trailer (247 lb-ft vs 230 lb-ft of torque)
- you mostly drive in town (43 mpg vs 39 mpg in the city)
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for most people, the CR-V Hybrid or the Cherokee?
On the specs compared here, the CR-V Hybrid makes more sense for most buyers; the Cherokee doesn’t win a single measurable area.
Executive Summary
Comparing the CR-V Hybrid and the Cherokee feels a bit like comparing two good restaurants with different menus. Start with the headline difference (the CR-V Hybrid has better fuel economy), and a lot of the decision falls into place. I’d also count 17 lb-ft more torque in the CR-V Hybrid’s favor.
Choose by what you’d use most: engine & performance leads to the CR-V Hybrid, the things a spec sheet can’t capture leads to the Cherokee.
My pick: the CR-V Hybrid.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.