Range Rover vs EQS SUV
Rivals in the full-size luxury suv class rarely match spec for spec, and the Range Rover and the EQS SUV are no exception. Close matchups are the hardest to call, and the Range Rover versus the EQS SUV is one of them.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance Range Rover wins
- Space & Practicality Tie
- Off-road & Towing Tie
- Engine & Performance3.5
- Engine & Performance1.4
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The Range Rover has 40 hp more power
Not a big gap, but a consistent one. The Range Rover’s 395 hp beats the EQS SUV’s 355 hp. More power helps with merging, overtaking and climbing hills, especially with passengers and luggage on board.
Design & Size
Engine & Performance
Range Rover leads
The Range Rover squeezes out a win in the engine & performance section. The Range Rover stands out with 40 hp more power. The Range Rover’s extra output gives it more in reserve when you need to get up to speed. That makes the Range Rover the natural choice for buyers focused on engine & performance.
Total system output
Range Rover: 395 hp EQS SUV: 355 hp Power is only part of the story; weight, gearing and torque delivery shape how quick a car feels.
Space & Practicality
Too close to call
This area ends level; whatever separates these two, it isn’t space & practicality. The space & practicality verdict: no winner, and no reason to worry either way.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
Both the Range Rover and the EQS SUV cover off-road & towing equally well on paper. Neither car gives you a reason to choose it on off-road & towing.
Safety & Tech
The Range Rover and the EQS SUV differ on safety & tech in ways that are described rather than measured. The table has the details.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | Range Rover | EQS SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Gas (48V mild hybrid) | Electric |
| Engine | 3.0L turbo I6 | Single rear electric motor |
| Total system output | 395 hp (winner) | 355 hp Least powerful in class |
| Torque | 406 lb-ft | 419 lb-ft |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 1-speed direct drive |
| Drivetrain | AWD (4WD) | RWD (4MATIC AWD available) |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | Range Rover | EQS SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available | 21 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Fuel economy (city) | 19 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Fuel economy (highway) | 24 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Electric range | N/A (not specified) | 323 mi |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | Range Rover | EQS SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | Range Rover | EQS SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Max towing | 8,200 lb | N/A (not specified) |
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | Range Rover | EQS SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Basic warranty | 4 yr / 50,000 mi | 4 yr / 50,000 mi |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Range Rover if…
- you merge, overtake or climb hills with a full load (395 hp vs 355 hp)
- you’re loyal to Land Rover and happy with it
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I buy the Range Rover or the EQS SUV?
On the specs compared here, the Range Rover makes more sense for most buyers; the EQS SUV doesn’t win a single measurable area.
Executive Summary
Let’s set the logos aside for a minute. The Range Rover and the EQS SUV are close competitors, and their spec sheets tell an interesting story. I’d put 40 hp more power at the top of the list, and it belongs to the Range Rover.
Think about your week. Heavy on engine & performance? The Range Rover. More about the things a spec sheet can’t capture? The EQS SUV.
My pick: the Range Rover.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.