Mazda Mazda3 front view
Mazda Mazda3 2025 · Compact Car
Photo: MercurySable99 via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0
SUBARUWRX
Subaru WRX 2025 · Compact Car

Mazda3 vs WRX

The Mazda3 and the WRX are aimed squarely at each other: same class, different badges. Count the areas and a pattern appears. The Mazda3 is ahead in 2 of 4, led by a clear margin in fuel economy & range.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Engine & Performance WRX wins
  • Fuel Economy & Range Mazda3 wins
  • Space & Practicality Mazda3 wins
  • Off-road & Towing Tie
Mazda3 spec score: 4.1 out of 104.1
Mazda3 Spec score
  • Engine & Performance2.8
  • Fuel Economy & Range4.8
  • Space & Practicality4.4
WRX spec score: 3.5 out of 103.5
WRX Spec score
  • Engine & Performance7.3
  • Fuel Economy & Range0.0
  • Space & Practicality4.0
Spec scores by area: Engine & Performance: Mazda3 2.8, WRX 7.3; Fuel Economy & Range: Mazda3 4.8, WRX 0.0; Space & Practicality: Mazda3 4.4, WRX 4.0Engine & PerformanceFuel Economy & RangeSpace & Practicality

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The WRX has 80 hp more power

    The WRX’s 271 hp leaves the Mazda3’s 191 hp well behind, so if this spec matters to you, the choice is easy. Power is only part of the story; weight, gearing and torque delivery shape how quick a car feels.

  2. The Mazda3 has better fuel economy

    Not a close call. The Mazda3 lists 31 mpg and the WRX lists 22 mpg. That’s a substantial gap. Better combined fuel economy lowers your running costs every week, and the savings add up over years of ownership.

  3. The WRX has 72 lb-ft more torque

    Among all the differences on this page, 258 lb-ft against 186 lb-ft is one of the most meaningful, and it favors the WRX. More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades.

  4. The Mazda3 has 5.6% more cargo space

    The WRX isn’t far behind at 12.5 cu ft, but the Mazda3’s 13.2 cu ft still comes out ahead. Cargo space behind the rear seats is what you use every day for groceries, strollers and luggage.

  5. The Mazda3 has better highway fuel economy

    The WRX gives up a lot on fuel economy (highway): 26 mpg, compared with 37 mpg on the Mazda3. Speed, wind and load affect highway use a lot, but the official rating is a fair comparison point.

Design & Size

Side-profile size comparison drawn from official dimensions (generic body shape). Mazda3: 183.5 in long, 56.9 in tall. WRX: 183.8 in long, 57.8 in tall.
  • Mazda3 183.5 in × 70.7 in × 56.9 in
  • WRX 183.8 in × 71.9 in × 57.8 in
These shapes are generated from the listed dimensions to show scale. Colors, curves and finishes aren’t represented.

Size-wise, the WRX takes up more space, and the Mazda3 is easier to fit where room is tight.

Dimensions
Dimensions: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
Length 183.5 in 183.8 in
Width (no mirrors) 70.7 in 71.9 in
Height 56.9 in 57.8 in
Wheelbase 107.3 in 105.4 in

Engine & Performance

WRX leads

The WRX wins the engine & performance section decisively. Here the WRX offers 80 hp more power. More power helps with merging, overtaking and climbing hills, especially with passengers and luggage on board. Prioritize engine & performance, and the WRX is where you should land.

Total system output

Mazda3: 191 hp
WRX: 271 hp (winner)

Torque

Mazda3: 186 lb-ft
WRX: 258 lb-ft (winner)
Mazda3WRX

Total system output

Mazda3: 191 hp WRX: 271 hp The WRX’s extra output gives it more in reserve when you need to get up to speed.

Torque

Mazda3: 186 lb-ft WRX: 258 lb-ft The WRX’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing.

Fuel Economy & Range

Mazda3 leads

Look at the fuel economy & range table and one name keeps coming out on top: the Mazda3. The Mazda3 gives you better fuel economy. The Mazda3 uses less fuel on the standard combined cycle, which matters most if you drive a lot. In short, the Mazda3 is the better-equipped car for fuel economy & range.

Fuel economy (combined)

Mazda3: 31 mpg (winner)
WRX: 22 mpg

Fuel economy (city)

Mazda3: 27 mpg (winner)
WRX: 19 mpg

Fuel economy (highway)

Mazda3: 37 mpg (winner)
WRX: 26 mpg
Mazda3WRX

Fuel economy (combined)

Mazda3: 31 mpg WRX: 22 mpg Official figures rarely match real-world driving exactly, but the ranking between two cars tends to hold.

Fuel economy (highway)

Mazda3: 37 mpg WRX: 26 mpg Highway fuel economy matters if you cover long distances at steady speeds.

Space & Practicality

Mazda3 leads

If you’re keeping score, the space & practicality point goes narrowly to the Mazda3. On its side, the Mazda3 has 5.6% more cargo space. Cargo figures are measured in different ways by different makers, so small gaps may not show in practice. Net result: the Mazda3 leads this part of the comparison.

Seats

Mazda3: 5 seats
WRX: 5 seats

Cargo (behind rear seats)

Mazda3: 13.2 cu ft (winner)
WRX: 12.5 cu ft
Mazda3WRX

Cargo (behind rear seats)

Mazda3: 13.2 cu ft WRX: 12.5 cu ft The Mazda3’s larger cargo area makes family trips and big shopping runs easier.

Off-road & Towing

Too close to call

If off-road & towing matters most to you, this section won’t make the decision for you: they’re level. Treat off-road & towing as common ground and look elsewhere for the deciding factor.

Safety & Tech

This section is descriptive. The Mazda3 and the WRX list different components for safety & tech, and the table spells them out.

Full Specifications

Engine & Performance
Engine & Performance: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
Powertrain Gas Gas
Engine 2.5L I4 2.4L turbo flat-4
Total system output 191 hp 271 hp (winner)
Torque 186 lb-ft 258 lb-ft (winner)
Transmission 6-speed automatic 6-speed manual
Drivetrain FWD (AWD available) AWD
Fuel Economy & Range
Fuel Economy & Range: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available 31 mpg (winner) 22 mpg Thirstiest in class
Fuel economy (city) 27 mpg (winner) 19 mpg Thirstiest in the city
Fuel economy (highway) 37 mpg (winner) 26 mpg Thirstiest on the highway
Space & Practicality
Space & Practicality: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Cargo (behind rear seats) 13.2 cu ft (winner) 12.5 cu ft Smallest cargo area
Off-road & Towing
Off-road & Towing: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
AWD / 4WD available Yes Yes
Safety & Tech
Safety & Tech: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
Largest touchscreen 10.3 in N/A (not specified)
Driver-assist suite Mazda i-Activsense N/A (not specified)
Basic warranty 3 yr / 36,000 mi 3 yr / 36,000 mi
Dimensions
Dimensions: Mazda3 vs WRX
SpecMazda3WRX
Length 183.5 in 183.8 in
Width (no mirrors) 70.7 in 71.9 in
Height 56.9 in 57.8 in
Wheelbase 107.3 in 105.4 in

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the Mazda3 if…

  • you want better combined fuel economy (31 mpg vs 22 mpg)
  • you want more cargo space behind the rear seats (13.2 cu ft vs 12.5 cu ft)
  • you cover long highway distances (37 mpg vs 26 mpg on the highway)
  • you want better city fuel economy (27 mpg vs 19 mpg)
Mazda3 specs & rivals

Choose the WRX if…

  • you merge, overtake or climb hills with a full load (271 hp vs 191 hp)
  • you want more pulling power from low speeds (258 lb-ft vs 186 lb-ft of torque)
  • you want the bigger car
WRX specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I buy the Mazda3 or the WRX?

We’d point most buyers to the Mazda3. The main exception is if you’d rather have 80 hp more power on the WRX.

Is the Mazda3 bigger than the WRX?

Going by the official dimensions, the WRX is the larger one: 183.8 × 71.9 × 57.8 in against the Mazda3’s 183.5 × 70.7 × 56.9 in.

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

The Mazda3 from Mazda and the WRX from Subaru go after the same buyer. Here’s how I see them. The biggest reason I lean toward the Mazda3 is simple: it has better fuel economy. Stack 5.6% more cargo space on top of that, and the Mazda3’s lead grows. Credit where it’s due: the WRX offers 80 hp more power.

If your days lean on fuel economy & range, I’d pick the Mazda3; if they lean on engine & performance, the WRX.

My pick: the Mazda3 for most people, with the WRX as the smarter choice if what you want most is 80 hp more power.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Mazda or Subaru. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: