SONYWF-1000XM6
Sony WF-1000XM6 2026 · from $330 · Premium Wireless Earbuds
APPLEAirPods Pro 3
Apple AirPods Pro 3 2025 · from $249 · Premium Wireless Earbuds

Sony WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3

The WF-1000XM6 and the AirPods Pro 3 land in the same premium wireless earbuds category, so the comparison is fair, and the differences are telling. This one has a front-runner. The AirPods Pro 3 wins 1 of 3 compared areas, and features & connectivity is where the difference is hardest to miss. That $81 launch price gap between the WF-1000XM6 and the AirPods Pro 3 will shape the verdict as much as any spec.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Sound & Noise Cancelling Tie
  • Battery & Charging Tie
  • Features & Connectivity AirPods Pro 3 wins
  • Price AirPods Pro 3 wins
WF-1000XM6 Spec score by area
  • Sound & Noise Cancelling10.0
  • Battery & Charging4.8
AirPods Pro 3 Spec score by area
  • Sound & Noise Cancelling10.0
  • Battery & Charging4.8

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The AirPods Pro 3 has a 0.03 oz lighter build

    This is a headline difference. With 0.20 oz to the WF-1000XM6’s 0.23 oz, the AirPods Pro 3 has a lead that’s easy to see on paper and in practice. Lighter earbuds or headsets feel less noticeable during long listening sessions.

  2. The AirPods Pro 3 has a tougher IP57 rating

    Put simply, the AirPods Pro 3 is far ahead here: IP57 compared with IPX4. The AirPods Pro 3 is better protected, which matters if you run in all weather.

  3. The AirPods Pro 3 has built-in heart-rate sensing

    Missing features are easy to overlook when you buy and hard to live without later. The WF-1000XM6 skips this one. Built-in heart-rate sensing lets you track workouts without wearing a watch or chest strap.

  4. The AirPods Pro 3 has

    A modest but measurable lead goes to the AirPods Pro 3: 1.55 oz compared with 1.66 oz. The AirPods Pro 3’s case is lighter, one less thing weighing down your pocket.

Design & Size

The WF-1000XM6 carries an extra 0.03 oz.

Fit & Build
Fit & Build: WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3
SpecWF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3
Form factor In-ear (stemless) In-ear with stem
Water resistance IPX4 IP57 (winner)
Weight (per earbud / headset) 0.23 oz 0.20 oz (winner)
Case weight 1.66 oz 1.55 oz (winner)

Sound & Noise Cancelling

Too close to call

This area ends level; whatever separates these two, it isn’t sound & noise cancelling. The takeaway: sound & noise cancelling is not where these two differ.

Battery & Charging

Too close to call

Neither the WF-1000XM6 nor the AirPods Pro 3 has a real advantage in the battery & charging category. Neither pair gives you a reason to choose it on battery & charging.

Battery (single charge)

WF-1000XM6: 8 h
AirPods Pro 3: 8 h

Battery (with case)

WF-1000XM6: 24 h
AirPods Pro 3: 24 h
WF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3

Features & Connectivity

AirPods Pro 3 leads

On features & connectivity, the difference is modest, and it favors the AirPods Pro 3. The AirPods Pro 3 stands out with built-in heart-rate sensing. If you already wear a fitness tracker, this feature is a nice extra rather than a must-have. For features & connectivity, the AirPods Pro 3 is the one to beat.

Heart-rate sensing

WF-1000XM6: no AirPods Pro 3: yes The AirPods Pro 3 can measure your heart rate during exercise; the WF-1000XM6 leaves that to other devices.

Full Specifications

Sound & Noise Cancelling
Sound & Noise Cancelling: WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3
SpecWF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3
Active noise cancelling Yes Yes
Transparency mode Yes Yes
Spatial audio N/A (not specified) Personalized Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking
Bluetooth codecs SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3 N/A (not specified)
Battery & Charging
Battery & Charging: WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3
SpecWF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3
Battery (single charge)Manufacturer rating, ANC on where available 8 h 8 h
Battery (with case)Manufacturer rating 24 h 24 h
Wireless charging Yes Yes
Charging port USB-C USB-C
Features & Connectivity
Features & Connectivity: WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3
SpecWF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.3 (Apple H2 chip)
Multipoint Yes N/A (not specified)
Heart-rate sensing No Yes (winner)
Hearing health features N/A (not specified) Hearing Test, Hearing Aid, Hearing Protection
Controls Touch Force sensor, swipe for volume
Fit & Build
Fit & Build: WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3
SpecWF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3
Form factor In-ear (stemless) In-ear with stem
Water resistance IPX4 IP57 (winner)
Weight (per earbud / headset) 0.23 oz 0.20 oz (winner)
Case weight 1.66 oz 1.55 oz (winner)
Price
Price: WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3
SpecWF-1000XM6AirPods Pro 3
Launch price $330 Priciest in class $249 (winner)

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Price & Value

WF-1000XM6 $330 US launch MSRP
AirPods Pro 3 $249 US launch MSRP

The price gap is wide: $81 at launch, which is 33% of difference between the AirPods Pro 3 and the WF-1000XM6. The AirPods Pro 3 is both $81 cheaper and ahead on more of the specs we compared.

Launch prices (US) as of February 2026. Discounts and bundles come and go, so compare current prices before buying.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the WF-1000XM6 if…

  • you prefer staying with Sony
WF-1000XM6 specs & rivals

Choose the AirPods Pro 3 if…

  • you want the lighter fit (0.20 oz vs 0.23 oz)
  • you work out hard or get caught in the rain (IP57 vs IPX4)
  • you like tracking your heart rate during workouts without a watch
  • you carry the case in a small pocket (1.55 oz vs 1.66 oz)
  • you don’t need the extras that cost $81 more
AirPods Pro 3 specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for most people, the WF-1000XM6 or the AirPods Pro 3?

On the specs compared here, the AirPods Pro 3 makes more sense for most buyers; the WF-1000XM6 doesn’t win a single measurable area.

Does the WF-1000XM6 last longer on a charge than the AirPods Pro 3?

It’s effectively a tie. The battery figures for the WF-1000XM6 and the AirPods Pro 3 are too close to call.

Which costs less, the WF-1000XM6 or the AirPods Pro 3?

The WF-1000XM6 launched at $81 more than the AirPods Pro 3, based on prices as of February 2026.

Is the WF-1000XM6 lighter than the AirPods Pro 3?

On the scale, the AirPods Pro 3 comes out ahead at 0.03 oz lighter than the WF-1000XM6.

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

Honestly, the WF-1000XM6 versus the AirPods Pro 3 is one of those matchups where your priorities matter more than the logo. The AirPods Pro 3 wins me over with a 0.03 oz lighter build. Beyond that, built-in heart-rate sensing gives the AirPods Pro 3 another edge.

The WF-1000XM6 makes sense for anyone who values the things a spec sheet can’t capture; the AirPods Pro 3 for anyone who values features & connectivity.

My pick: the AirPods Pro 3.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Sony or Apple. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: