APPLEApple Watch SE 3
Apple Watch SE 3 2025 · from $249 · Everyday Smartwatch
GARMINVíVoactive 6
Garmin VíVoactive 6 2025 · from $300 · Everyday Smartwatch

Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6

Both the Apple Watch SE 3 and the Garmin Vivoactive 6 sit in the everyday smartwatch class, and Apple and Garmin are clearly watching each other. On the overall scorecard, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is ahead: 2 of 4 areas, with battery life doing the heavy lifting. Money matters here as well, since the Garmin Vivoactive 6 started out $51 above the Apple Watch SE 3.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Display Tie
  • Health & Fitness Sensors Garmin Vivoactive 6 wins
  • Battery Life Garmin Vivoactive 6 wins
  • Smart Features & Connectivity Apple Watch SE 3 wins
  • Price Apple Watch SE 3 wins
Apple Watch SE 3 Spec score by area
  • Health & Fitness Sensors1.7
  • Smart Features & Connectivity10.0
Garmin Vivoactive 6 Spec score by area
  • Health & Fitness Sensors3.3
  • Smart Features & Connectivity3.6

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 has 1367% more rated battery life

    Not a close call. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 lists 11 days and the Apple Watch SE 3 lists 18 h. That’s a substantial gap. Longer battery life means fewer nights on the charger, which also makes sleep tracking easier.

  2. The Apple Watch SE 3 has a cellular option

    Whether it matters depends on your habits, but only one of these two gives you a cellular option: the Apple Watch SE 3. A cellular option lets the watch take calls, receive messages and stream music without your phone nearby.

  3. The Apple Watch SE 3 has 56 GB more storage

    Among all the differences on this page, 64 GB against 8 GB is one of the most meaningful, and it favors the Apple Watch SE 3. If you run or train without your phone, the Apple Watch SE 3’s extra storage is useful.

  4. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 has blood-oxygen readings

    Missing features are easy to overlook when you buy and hard to live without later. The Apple Watch SE 3 skips this one. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 can take blood-oxygen readings; the Apple Watch SE 3 can’t.

Design & Size

Case size comparison drawn from official dimensions. Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
  • Apple Watch SE 3 44 mm × 0.42 in
  • Garmin Vivoactive 6 42 mm × 0.43 in
This outline is drawn to scale from the manufacturer’s dimensions; it shows proportions, not design details.

By the manufacturer’s measurements, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is the more compact watch, and the Apple Watch SE 3 the larger one.

Design & Durability
Design & Durability: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Case size (largest) 44 mm 42 mm
Available sizes 40 mm, 44 mm 42 mm
Water resistance 50 m 50 m
Case material Aluminum Fiber-reinforced polymer, aluminum bezel
Thickness 0.42 in 0.43 in
Weight (largest, no band) 1.16 oz N/A (not specified)

Display

Too close to call

Swap one for the other and you’d lose nothing on display. If display was going to be your tiebreaker, you’ll need a different one.

Health & Fitness Sensors

Garmin Vivoactive 6 leads

If you’re keeping score, the health & fitness sensors point goes narrowly to the Garmin Vivoactive 6. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 answers with blood-oxygen readings. Wrist-based blood-oxygen data is a wellness indicator rather than a medical measurement, so treat it as a trend. If this section decides it for you, choose the Garmin Vivoactive 6.

Blood oxygen

Apple Watch SE 3: no Garmin Vivoactive 6: yes Blood-oxygen readings can add context to sleep tracking and to training at altitude.

Battery Life

Garmin Vivoactive 6 leads

In the battery life category, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 isn’t just ahead; it’s clearly ahead. In its favor, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 has 1367% more rated battery life. The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is rated to last longer between charges, a big deal on trips and long weekends. Prioritize battery life, and the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is where you should land.

Rated battery life

Apple Watch SE 3: 18 h
Garmin Vivoactive 6: 11 days (winner)
Apple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6

Rated battery life

Apple Watch SE 3: 18 h Garmin Vivoactive 6: 11 days Ratings assume typical use; GPS workouts and always-on screens will shorten both.

Smart Features & Connectivity

Apple Watch SE 3 leads

Few areas are as clear-cut as this one: the Apple Watch SE 3 leads the smart features & connectivity section with room to spare. The Apple Watch SE 3 pulls ahead with a cellular option. With the Apple Watch SE 3, you can leave your phone at home on a run; the Garmin Vivoactive 6 depends on it for connectivity. The smart features & connectivity verdict goes to the Apple Watch SE 3.

Storage

Apple Watch SE 3: 64 GB (winner)
Garmin Vivoactive 6: 8 GB
Apple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6

Cellular option

Apple Watch SE 3: yes Garmin Vivoactive 6: no Cellular models usually cost more and need a plan, so it’s only worth it if you’ll use the freedom.

Storage

Apple Watch SE 3: 64 GB Garmin Vivoactive 6: 8 GB More storage leaves room for offline music, podcasts and maps on your wrist.

Full Specifications

Display
Display: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Display type Always-On Retina LTPO OLED AMOLED
Resolution (largest) 368 x 448 390 x 390
Peak brightness 1,000 nits N/A (not specified)
Always-on display Yes Yes
Health & Fitness Sensors
Health & Fitness Sensors: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Optical heart rate Yes Yes
ECG No No
Blood oxygen No Yes (winner)
Skin temperature Yes N/A (not specified)
GPS Built-in L1 GPS (GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou) Built-in GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou)
Dual-frequency GPS No No
Battery Life
Battery Life: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Rated battery lifeManufacturer rating, typical use 18 h 11 days (winner)
Rated life in low-power modeManufacturer rating 32 h Shortest low-power mode N/A (not specified)
Charging Fast charging, 0 to 80% in about 45 min N/A (not specified)
Smart Features & Connectivity
Smart Features & Connectivity: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Chip S10 N/A (not specified)
Storage 64 GB (winner) 8 GB
Cellular option Yes (winner) No
Contactless payments Yes Yes
Phone compatibility iPhone only iPhone and Android
Software watchOS Garmin proprietary
Design & Durability
Design & Durability: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Case size (largest) 44 mm 42 mm
Available sizes 40 mm, 44 mm 42 mm
Water resistance 50 m 50 m
Case material Aluminum Fiber-reinforced polymer, aluminum bezel
Thickness 0.42 in 0.43 in
Weight (largest, no band) 1.16 oz N/A (not specified)
Price
Price: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6
SpecApple Watch SE 3Garmin Vivoactive 6
Launch price $249 (winner) $300

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Price & Value

Apple Watch SE 3 $249 US launch MSRP, 40 mm aluminum GPS
Garmin Vivoactive 6 $300 US launch MSRP

That’s $51 between the two launch prices, a spread of 20% that makes the Apple Watch SE 3 the value-minded choice. Is the Garmin Vivoactive 6 worth $51 extra? What you get for the money is 1367% more rated battery life and blood-oxygen readings.

All prices are official US launch prices, last checked September 2025. Actual prices at stores may differ.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the Apple Watch SE 3 if…

  • you want a cellular option
  • you want more on-watch storage (64 GB vs 8 GB)
  • you want the lower price and can live with the trade-offs ($51 less)
Apple Watch SE 3 specs & rivals

Choose the Garmin Vivoactive 6 if…

  • you want the longer rated battery life (11 days vs 18 h)
  • you like tracking blood oxygen during sleep or at altitude
  • you prefer something easier to fit into tight spaces
Garmin Vivoactive 6 specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I buy the Apple Watch SE 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 6?

For most people, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is the stronger choice, unless you value a cellular option above everything else.

Which has better battery life, the Apple Watch SE 3 or the Garmin Vivoactive 6?

Going by the official figures, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 leads: 11 days versus 18 h for rated battery life. Screen use, settings and efficiency will shape your own results.

Is the Apple Watch SE 3 bigger than the Garmin Vivoactive 6?

The larger model here is the Apple Watch SE 3 (0.42 in); the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is more compact at 0.43 in.

Is the Apple Watch SE 3 cheaper than the Garmin Vivoactive 6?

The Apple Watch SE 3 is the cheaper option, launching at $51 less than the Garmin Vivoactive 6 (launch prices as of September 2025).

Does the Apple Watch SE 3 have more storage than the Garmin Vivoactive 6?

The Apple Watch SE 3 comes with more room: 64 GB versus 8 GB.

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

Apple or Garmin? For a lot of people, the question really comes down to the Apple Watch SE 3 versus the Garmin Vivoactive 6. The biggest reason I lean toward the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is simple: it has 1367% more rated battery life. Stack blood-oxygen readings on top of that, and the Garmin Vivoactive 6’s lead grows. Still, if you care most about a cellular option, the Apple Watch SE 3 deserves a look.

In my head, the Apple Watch SE 3 is the smart features & connectivity pick and the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is the health & fitness sensors pick.

My pick: the Garmin Vivoactive 6, and I’d only look at the Apple Watch SE 3 if your top priority is a cellular option.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Apple or Garmin. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: