Q6 e-tron vs NX 250
Put the Q6 e-tron next to the NX 250 and you have Audi and Lexus going after exactly the same compact luxury suv crowd. Neither car runs away with this one; most of the differences are small enough to shrug off.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance Q6 e-tron wins
- Space & Practicality Tie
- Off-road & Towing Tie
Key Differences
-
The Q6 e-tron has 119 hp more power
The NX 250 gives up a lot on total system output: 203 hp, compared with 322 hp on the Q6 e-tron. The Q6 e-tron’s extra output gives it more in reserve when you need to get up to speed.
Design & Size
Engine & Performance
Q6 e-tron leads
This is one of the Q6 e-tron’s strongest areas. On engine & performance, the NX 250 falls well short. The Q6 e-tron wins here with 119 hp more power. Power is only part of the story; weight, gearing and torque delivery shape how quick a car feels. In short, the Q6 e-tron is the better-equipped car for engine & performance.
Total system output
Q6 e-tron: 322 hp NX 250: 203 hp More power helps with merging, overtaking and climbing hills, especially with passengers and luggage on board.
Space & Practicality
Too close to call
The space & practicality section is even. Any gaps here are within the range you’d never notice. The space & practicality verdict: no winner, and no reason to worry either way.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
Evenly matched is the fairest summary of the off-road & towing section. Treat off-road & towing as common ground and look elsewhere for the deciding factor.
Safety & Tech
For safety & tech, the spec sheet lists components and formats rather than figures we can rank. The table shows what the Q6 e-tron and the NX 250 each bring.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | Q6 e-tron | NX 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Electric | Gas |
| Engine | Single rear electric motor | 2.5L I4 |
| Total system output | 322 hp (winner) | 203 hp Least powerful in class |
| Torque | N/A (not specified) | 184 lb-ft Least torque in class |
| Transmission | 1-speed direct drive | 8-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD (quattro AWD available) | FWD (AWD available) |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | Q6 e-tron | NX 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Electric range | 310 mi | N/A (not specified) |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | Q6 e-tron | NX 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo (behind rear seats) | N/A (not specified) | 22.7 cu ft |
| Cargo (seats folded) | N/A (not specified) | 46.9 cu ft Least room, seats folded |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | Q6 e-tron | NX 250 |
|---|---|---|
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | Q6 e-tron | NX 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Basic warranty | 4 yr / 50,000 mi | 4 yr / 50,000 mi |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Q6 e-tron if…
- you merge, overtake or climb hills with a full load (322 hp vs 203 hp)
- you already use other Audi products
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I buy the Q6 e-tron or the NX 250?
On the specs compared here, the Q6 e-tron makes more sense for most buyers; the NX 250 doesn’t win a single measurable area.
Executive Summary
Here’s my honest read on a classic rivalry: Audi’s Q6 e-tron against Lexus’s NX 250. What I like most about the Q6 e-tron here is 119 hp more power.
Fit matters more than scores here. The Q6 e-tron suits buyers focused on engine & performance; the NX 250 suits those focused on the things a spec sheet can’t capture.
My pick: the Q6 e-tron.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.