X2 vs EC40
Choosing between BMW and Volvo often comes down to a specific pair of products. In the subcompact luxury suv class, that pair is the X2 and the EC40. Expect a close race. The X2 and the EC40 trade small edges rather than knockout blows.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance EC40 wins
- Space & Practicality Tie
- Off-road & Towing Tie
- Engine & Performance7.5
- Engine & Performance8.5
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The EC40 has 15 lb-ft more torque
The EC40 has a modest edge on torque: 310 lb-ft against 295 lb-ft for the X2. Electrified powertrains deliver torque instantly, so compare torque figures alongside the powertrain type.
Design & Size
Engine & Performance
EC40 leads
On balance, the EC40 leads the engine & performance section, just not by much. The EC40 steps ahead thanks to 15 lb-ft more torque. More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades. Net result: the EC40 leads this part of the comparison.
Torque
X2: 295 lb-ft EC40: 310 lb-ft The EC40’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing.
Space & Practicality
Too close to call
This area ends level; whatever separates these two, it isn’t space & practicality. On space & practicality alone, you can’t go far wrong with either.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
Evenly matched is the fairest summary of the off-road & towing section. Net result on off-road & towing: level.
Safety & Tech
Names, not numbers: the safety & tech rows below show what each one is built with, and it’s worth reading them side by side.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | X2 | EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Gas | Electric |
| Engine | 2.0L turbo I4 | Single rear electric motor |
| Total system output | 241 hp | 248 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft (winner) |
| Transmission | 7-speed dual-clutch | 1-speed direct drive |
| Drivetrain | AWD (xDrive) | RWD (AWD available) |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | X2 | EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available | 28 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Fuel economy (city) | 24 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Fuel economy (highway) | 33 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Electric range | N/A (not specified) | 298 mi Longest electric range |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | X2 | EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | X2 | EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | X2 | EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Basic warranty | 4 yr / 50,000 mi | 4 yr / 50,000 mi |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the EC40 if…
- you want more pulling power from low speeds (310 lb-ft vs 295 lb-ft of torque)
- you prefer staying with Volvo
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for most people, the X2 or the EC40?
On the specs compared here, the EC40 makes more sense for most buyers; the X2 doesn’t win a single measurable area.
Executive Summary
Here’s my take on BMW’s X2 versus Volvo’s EC40. What I like most about the EC40 here is 15 lb-ft more torque.
The X2 makes sense for anyone who values the things a spec sheet can’t capture; the EC40 for anyone who values engine & performance.
My pick: the EC40.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.