Honda HR-V front view
Honda HR-V 2025 · Subcompact SUV
Photo: Just a Man via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 4.0
Subaru Crosstrek front view
Subaru Crosstrek 2025 · Subcompact SUV
Photo: © M 93 via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0 de

HR-V vs Crosstrek

For subcompact suv shoppers, the HR-V from Honda and the Crosstrek from Subaru are two of the obvious candidates. Spec for spec, there isn’t much daylight between them, so small details and personal priorities will decide it.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Engine & Performance Crosstrek wins
  • Fuel Economy & Range Crosstrek wins
  • Space & Practicality Tie
  • Off-road & Towing Tie
HR-V Spec score by area
  • Engine & Performance1.7
  • Fuel Economy & Range1.8
Crosstrek Spec score by area
  • Engine & Performance1.8
  • Fuel Economy & Range2.5

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The Crosstrek has 7 lb-ft more torque

    Close, but not identical: the Crosstrek lists 145 lb-ft and the HR-V lists 138 lb-ft. The Crosstrek’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing.

  2. The Crosstrek has better highway fuel economy

    The gap on fuel economy (highway) is slim (34 mpg against 32 mpg), yet it tips toward the Crosstrek. Speed, wind and load affect highway use a lot, but the official rating is a fair comparison point.

Design & Size

Dimensions
Dimensions: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Wheelbase 104.5 in N/A (not specified)

Engine & Performance

Crosstrek leads

The HR-V comes close on engine & performance, but the Crosstrek does just enough to lead. Here the Crosstrek offers 7 lb-ft more torque. Electrified powertrains deliver torque instantly, so compare torque figures alongside the powertrain type. For engine & performance, the Crosstrek is the one to beat.

Total system output

HR-V: 158 hp
Crosstrek: 152 hp

Torque

HR-V: 138 lb-ft
Crosstrek: 145 lb-ft (winner)
HR-VCrosstrek

Torque

HR-V: 138 lb-ft Crosstrek: 145 lb-ft More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades.

Fuel Economy & Range

Crosstrek leads

A modest lead on fuel economy & range belongs to the Crosstrek. The Crosstrek scores with better highway fuel economy. The Crosstrek uses less fuel on the highway, a real saving on road trips and long commutes. Anyone shopping mainly on fuel economy & range should start with the Crosstrek.

Fuel economy (combined)

HR-V: 28 mpg
Crosstrek: 29 mpg

Fuel economy (city)

HR-V: 26 mpg
Crosstrek: 27 mpg

Fuel economy (highway)

HR-V: 32 mpg
Crosstrek: 34 mpg (winner)
HR-VCrosstrek

Fuel economy (highway)

HR-V: 32 mpg Crosstrek: 34 mpg Highway fuel economy matters if you cover long distances at steady speeds.

Space & Practicality

Too close to call

If space & practicality matters most to you, this section won’t make the decision for you: they’re level. So space & practicality is a non-factor here; move on to the areas where they actually differ.

Seats

HR-V: 5 seats
Crosstrek: 5 seats
HR-VCrosstrek

Off-road & Towing

Too close to call

Evenly matched is the fairest summary of the off-road & towing section. The takeaway: off-road & towing is not where these two differ.

Safety & Tech

This section is descriptive. The HR-V and the Crosstrek list different components for safety & tech, and the table spells them out.

Full Specifications

Engine & Performance
Engine & Performance: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Powertrain Gas Gas
Engine 2.0L I4 2.0L flat-4
Total system output 158 hp 152 hp
Torque 138 lb-ft 145 lb-ft (winner)
Transmission CVT CVT
Drivetrain FWD (AWD available) AWD
Fuel Economy & Range
Fuel Economy & Range: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available 28 mpg 29 mpg
Fuel economy (city) 26 mpg 27 mpg
Fuel economy (highway) 32 mpg 34 mpg (winner)
Space & Practicality
Space & Practicality: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Cargo (behind rear seats) 24.4 cu ft N/A (not specified)
Cargo (seats folded) 55.1 cu ft N/A (not specified)
Off-road & Towing
Off-road & Towing: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Ground clearance N/A (not specified) 8.70 in Highest ground clearance
AWD / 4WD available Yes Yes
Safety & Tech
Safety & Tech: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Driver-assist suite Honda Sensing Subaru EyeSight
Basic warranty 3 yr / 36,000 mi 3 yr / 36,000 mi
Dimensions
Dimensions: HR-V vs Crosstrek
SpecHR-VCrosstrek
Wheelbase 104.5 in N/A (not specified)

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the HR-V if…

  • you’re comfortable with how Honda does things
HR-V specs & rivals

Choose the Crosstrek if…

  • you often drive loaded up or with a trailer (145 lb-ft vs 138 lb-ft of torque)
  • you want better highway fuel economy (34 mpg vs 32 mpg)
  • you trust Subaru and want to keep things familiar
Crosstrek specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I buy the HR-V or the Crosstrek?

On the specs compared here, the Crosstrek makes more sense for most buyers; the HR-V doesn’t win a single measurable area.

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

Here’s the short version of how I’d choose between the HR-V and the Crosstrek. Start with the headline difference (the Crosstrek has 7 lb-ft more torque), and a lot of the decision falls into place. A second reason: the Crosstrek comes with better highway fuel economy.

I’d match them like this: the things a spec sheet can’t capture to the HR-V, engine & performance to the Crosstrek.

My pick: the Crosstrek.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Honda or Subaru. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: