RDX vs Q4 e-tron
The RDX and the Q4 e-tron are direct rivals in the compact luxury suv class, one from Acura and one from Audi. The data points to two closely matched options rather than a clear favorite.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance Q4 e-tron wins
- Space & Practicality Tie
- Off-road & Towing Tie
- Engine & Performance4.4
- Engine & Performance6.9
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The Q4 e-tron has 122 lb-ft more torque
On torque, the Q4 e-tron posts 402 lb-ft against 280 lb-ft for the RDX, a gap big enough to feel in everyday use. Electrified powertrains deliver torque instantly, so compare torque figures alongside the powertrain type.
Design & Size
Engine & Performance
Q4 e-tron leads
Few areas are as clear-cut as this one: the Q4 e-tron leads the engine & performance section with room to spare. The Q4 e-tron delivers 122 lb-ft more torque. More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades. For anyone who cares most about engine & performance, the Q4 e-tron is the safer choice.
Torque
RDX: 280 lb-ft Q4 e-tron: 402 lb-ft The Q4 e-tron’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing.
Space & Practicality
Too close to call
There’s no meaningful winner in the space & practicality section; the two are too close to separate. This section won’t settle the choice, so weigh the other areas more heavily.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
The RDX and the Q4 e-tron match each other closely in this area. For off-road & towing, pick whichever you prefer for other reasons.
Safety & Tech
This section is descriptive. The RDX and the Q4 e-tron list different components for safety & tech, and the table spells them out.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | RDX | Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Gas | Electric |
| Engine | 2.0L turbo I4 | Single rear electric motor |
| Total system output | 272 hp | 282 hp |
| Torque | 280 lb-ft | 402 lb-ft (winner) |
| Transmission | 10-speed automatic | 1-speed direct drive |
| Drivetrain | N/A (not specified) | RWD (quattro AWD available) |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | RDX | Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| Electric range | N/A (not specified) | 288 mi Shortest electric range |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | RDX | Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo (behind rear seats) | 29.5 cu ft | N/A (not specified) |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 58.9 cu ft | N/A (not specified) |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | RDX | Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | RDX | Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| Basic warranty | 4 yr / 50,000 mi | 4 yr / 50,000 mi |
Price
| Spec | RDX | Q4 e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | N/A (not specified) | $49,800 |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Q4 e-tron if…
- you want more pulling power from low speeds (402 lb-ft vs 280 lb-ft of torque)
- you’re comfortable with how Audi does things
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for most people, the RDX or the Q4 e-tron?
On the specs compared here, the Q4 e-tron makes more sense for most buyers; the RDX doesn’t win a single measurable area.
Executive Summary
Honestly, the RDX versus the Q4 e-tron is one of those matchups where your priorities matter more than the logo. I keep coming back to one thing: the Q4 e-tron gets 122 lb-ft more torque.
A quick self-test: do you care more about the things a spec sheet can’t capture or engine & performance? The first answer means the RDX, the second means the Q4 e-tron.
My pick: the Q4 e-tron.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.