Acura RDX front view
Acura RDX 2025 · Compact Luxury SUV
Photo: Bull-Doser via Wikimedia Commons / Public domain
INFINITIQX50
Infiniti QX50 2025 · Compact Luxury SUV

RDX vs QX50

Shopping across brands means comparing different philosophies. The RDX and the QX50 show how Acura and Infiniti each approach the compact luxury suv class. The honest headline: the RDX and the QX50 are evenly matched in most of the areas we compared.

Summarize this comparison with AI:

At a glance

  • Engine & Performance Tie
  • Space & Practicality QX50 wins
  • Off-road & Towing Tie
RDX Spec score by area
  • Engine & Performance4.4
  • Space & Practicality7.8
QX50 Spec score by area
  • Engine & Performance4.2
  • Space & Practicality10.0

Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.

Key Differences

  1. The QX50 has 6.4% more cargo space

    If everything else were equal, this small edge would favor the QX50: 31.4 cu ft against 29.5 cu ft. The QX50’s larger cargo area makes family trips and big shopping runs easier.

  2. The QX50 has 11% more maximum cargo space

    Not a big gap, but a consistent one. The QX50’s 65.1 cu ft beats the RDX’s 58.9 cu ft. Check the shape of the load floor too: a flat floor can matter as much as the number.

Design & Size

Dimensions
Dimensions: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
Length N/A (not specified) 184.7 in
Width (no mirrors) N/A (not specified) 74.9 in
Wheelbase N/A (not specified) 110.2 in

Engine & Performance

Too close to call

This is a tie in all but name. On engine & performance, both deliver about the same. Don’t let engine & performance decide this one; look at the other sections instead.

Total system output

RDX: 272 hp
QX50: 268 hp

Torque

RDX: 280 lb-ft
QX50: 280 lb-ft
RDXQX50

Space & Practicality

QX50 leads

Look at the space & practicality table and one name keeps coming out on top: the QX50. The QX50 scores with 6.4% more cargo space. Cargo figures are measured in different ways by different makers, so small gaps may not show in practice. For anyone who cares most about space & practicality, the QX50 is the safer choice.

Seats

RDX: 5 seats
QX50: 5 seats

Cargo (behind rear seats)

RDX: 29.5 cu ft
QX50: 31.4 cu ft (winner)

Cargo (seats folded)

RDX: 58.9 cu ft
QX50: 65.1 cu ft (winner)
RDXQX50

Cargo (behind rear seats)

RDX: 29.5 cu ft QX50: 31.4 cu ft Cargo space behind the rear seats is what you use every day for groceries, strollers and luggage.

Cargo (seats folded)

RDX: 58.9 cu ft QX50: 65.1 cu ft Maximum cargo space with the seats folded matters when you move furniture, bikes or bulky gear.

Off-road & Towing

Too close to call

Side by side, the off-road & towing figures for the RDX and the QX50 barely differ. Neither car gives you a reason to choose it on off-road & towing.

Safety & Tech

On safety & tech, the useful details are the names in the table: what each one uses, not a figure we can rank.

Full Specifications

Engine & Performance
Engine & Performance: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
Powertrain Gas Gas
Engine 2.0L turbo I4 2.0L turbo I4 (VC-Turbo)
Total system output 272 hp 268 hp
Torque 280 lb-ft 280 lb-ft
Transmission 10-speed automatic CVT
Drivetrain N/A (not specified) FWD (AWD available)
Fuel Economy & Range
Fuel Economy & Range: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available N/A (not specified) 26 mpg
Fuel economy (city) N/A (not specified) 23 mpg
Fuel economy (highway) N/A (not specified) 29 mpg
Space & Practicality
Space & Practicality: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Cargo (behind rear seats) 29.5 cu ft 31.4 cu ft (winner) Biggest cargo area
Cargo (seats folded) 58.9 cu ft 65.1 cu ft (winner) Most room, seats folded
Off-road & Towing
Off-road & Towing: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
AWD / 4WD available Yes Yes
Safety & Tech
Safety & Tech: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
Basic warranty 4 yr / 50,000 mi 4 yr / 60,000 mi
Dimensions
Dimensions: RDX vs QX50
SpecRDXQX50
Length N/A (not specified) 184.7 in
Width (no mirrors) N/A (not specified) 74.9 in
Wheelbase N/A (not specified) 110.2 in

“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose the RDX if…

  • you trust Acura and want to keep things familiar
RDX specs & rivals

Choose the QX50 if…

  • you want more cargo space behind the rear seats (31.4 cu ft vs 29.5 cu ft)
  • you move bulky items now and then (65.1 cu ft vs 58.9 cu ft maximum cargo)
  • you already use other Infiniti products
QX50 specs & rivals

Also Compared

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for most people, the RDX or the QX50?

On the specs compared here, the QX50 makes more sense for most buyers; the RDX doesn’t win a single measurable area.

Executive Summary

Founder & Editor

Acura makes the RDX, Infiniti makes the QX50, and both want the same spot on your shortlist. Here’s where I land. What tips it for me is that the QX50 has 6.4% more cargo space.

The RDX is for you if the things a spec sheet can’t capture tops your list; the QX50 is for you if space & practicality does.

My pick: the QX50.

Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.

Independent comparison, not affiliated with Acura or Infiniti. Specs from manufacturer data as compiled by VersusVerdict. · Last updated: · Spotted an error? Report a correction

Summarize this comparison with AI: