Expedition vs Sequoia
The Expedition and the Sequoia are two different answers to the same full-size suv brief, each with its own set of priorities. The data doesn’t leave much room for doubt: 2 of 4 areas go to the Sequoia, and the gap is widest in fuel economy & range.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance Sequoia wins
- Fuel Economy & Range Sequoia wins
- Off-road & Towing Tie
- Safety & Tech Tie
- Price Expedition wins
- Engine & Performance5.2
- Fuel Economy & Range5.2
- Off-road & Towing8.5
- Engine & Performance10.0
- Fuel Economy & Range10.0
- Off-road & Towing8.2
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The Sequoia has better fuel economy
A clear win for the Sequoia: 22 mpg against 19 mpg. Few specs in this matchup are as one-sided. Better combined fuel economy lowers your running costs every week, and the savings add up over years of ownership.
-
The Sequoia has 103 lb-ft more torque
Here the Sequoia pulls well ahead of the Expedition, with 583 lb-ft compared to 480 lb-ft. More torque means stronger pulling from low speeds, which you feel when accelerating from a stop or climbing grades.
-
The Sequoia has 37 hp more power
The Expedition isn’t far behind at 400 hp, but the Sequoia’s 437 hp still comes out ahead. Power is only part of the story; weight, gearing and torque delivery shape how quick a car feels.
-
The Sequoia has better city fuel economy
The Sequoia doesn’t just edge this one; 21 mpg against 16 mpg is a lead you’ll feel. City fuel economy matters most if your driving is mostly short trips, traffic and stop-and-go commutes.
Design & Size
Dimensions
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Length | N/A (not specified) | 208.1 in |
| Width (no mirrors) | N/A (not specified) | 79.6 in |
| Height | N/A (not specified) | 74.5 in |
| Wheelbase | N/A (not specified) | 122 in |
Engine & Performance
Sequoia leads
The Sequoia dominates the engine & performance section, and the gaps are large enough to matter in daily use. The Sequoia stands out with 103 lb-ft more torque. The Sequoia’s extra torque makes it more relaxed when fully loaded or towing. Net result: the Sequoia leads this part of the comparison.
Torque
Expedition: 480 lb-ft Sequoia: 583 lb-ft Electrified powertrains deliver torque instantly, so compare torque figures alongside the powertrain type.
Total system output
Expedition: 400 hp Sequoia: 437 hp More power helps with merging, overtaking and climbing hills, especially with passengers and luggage on board.
Fuel Economy & Range
Sequoia leads
Look at the fuel economy & range table and one name keeps coming out on top: the Sequoia. The Sequoia steps ahead thanks to better fuel economy. Official figures rarely match real-world driving exactly, but the ranking between two cars tends to hold. So if fuel economy & range tops your list, lean toward the Sequoia.
Fuel economy (combined)
Expedition: 19 mpg Sequoia: 22 mpg The Sequoia uses less fuel on the standard combined cycle, which matters most if you drive a lot.
Fuel economy (city)
Expedition: 16 mpg Sequoia: 21 mpg In town, driving style has a big effect, but the Sequoia starts from a better baseline.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
Evenly matched is the fairest summary of the off-road & towing section. If off-road & towing was going to be your tiebreaker, you’ll need a different one.
Safety & Tech
Too close to call
Side by side, the safety & tech figures for the Expedition and the Sequoia barely differ. The safety & tech verdict: no winner, and no reason to worry either way.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Gas | Hybrid |
| Engine | 3.5L twin-turbo V6 (EcoBoost) | 3.4L twin-turbo V6 hybrid (i-FORCE MAX) |
| Total system output | 400 hp | 437 hp (winner) Most powerful in class |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft | 583 lb-ft (winner) Most torque in class |
| Transmission | 10-speed automatic | 10-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD (4x4 available) | RWD (4WD available) |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available | 19 mpg | 22 mpg (winner) Most efficient in class |
| Fuel economy (city) | 16 mpg | 21 mpg (winner) Best city economy |
| Fuel economy (highway) | 24 mpg | 24 mpg |
| Fuel tank | N/A (not specified) | 22.5 gal |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | N/A (not specified) | 8 seats |
| Cargo (behind rear seats) | N/A (not specified) | 11.5 cu ft Smallest cargo area |
| Cargo (seats folded) | N/A (not specified) | 86.9 cu ft Least room, seats folded |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Max towing | 9,600 lb | 9,520 lb |
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Largest touchscreen | 13.2 in Smallest touchscreen | 14 in |
| Driver-assist suite | Ford Co-Pilot360 | N/A (not specified) |
| Basic warranty | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | 3 yr / 36,000 mi |
Dimensions
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Length | N/A (not specified) | 208.1 in |
| Width (no mirrors) | N/A (not specified) | 79.6 in |
| Height | N/A (not specified) | 74.5 in |
| Wheelbase | N/A (not specified) | 122 in |
Price
| Spec | Expedition | Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | $62,400 (winner) | $65,725 |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Price & Value
With just $3,325 between them at launch, the Expedition and the Sequoia are priced as near equals. The Expedition saves $3,325, but the Sequoia answers with better fuel economy and 103 lb-ft more torque.
Launch prices in the US as of September 2026; street prices move, so check before you buy.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Expedition if…
- you don’t need the extras that cost $3,325 more
- you already use other Ford products
Choose the Sequoia if…
- you want better combined fuel economy (22 mpg vs 19 mpg)
- you want more pulling power from low speeds (583 lb-ft vs 480 lb-ft of torque)
- you merge, overtake or climb hills with a full load (437 hp vs 400 hp)
- you want better city fuel economy (21 mpg vs 16 mpg)
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I buy the Expedition or the Sequoia?
For most people, the Sequoia is the stronger choice, unless saving $3,325 matters more to you than the extras.
Which costs less, the Expedition or the Sequoia?
The Expedition is the cheaper option, launching at $3,325 less than the Sequoia (launch prices as of September 2026).
Executive Summary
I don’t have a favorite brand in this fight between the Expedition and the Sequoia. I just have opinions about the numbers. I keep coming back to one thing: the Sequoia gets better fuel economy. Less flashy, but still real: the Sequoia brings 103 lb-ft more torque.
If you’d rather have strength in price, go with the Expedition. If engine & performance is what you’d miss, go with the Sequoia.
My pick: the Sequoia is the one I’d buy, unless the extra $3,325 would stretch your budget.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.