Eclipse Cross vs C-HR
Same class, different makers. The Eclipse Cross (Mitsubishi) and the C-HR (Toyota) are built for the same kind of buyer. Here the verdict on paper is fairly clear. The C-HR takes 3 of 4 areas against the Eclipse Cross, starting with space & practicality. The launch prices sit $9,305 apart, with the Eclipse Cross on the more affordable side.
At a glance
- Engine & Performance C-HR wins
- Space & Practicality C-HR wins
- Off-road & Towing Tie
- Safety & Tech C-HR wins
- Price Eclipse Cross wins
- Space & Practicality4.8
- Space & Practicality7.0
Spec scores (0 to 10) are calculated from manufacturer specs against other models in the same class. See how the formula works. They are not reviews or user ratings.
Key Differences
-
The C-HR has 186 hp more power
On total system output, the C-HR posts 338 hp against 152 hp for the Eclipse Cross, a gap big enough to feel in everyday use. The C-HR’s extra output gives it more in reserve when you need to get up to speed.
-
The C-HR has 19% more maximum cargo space
This is one of the widest gaps in the whole comparison: 59.5 cu ft for the C-HR versus 50.1 cu ft for the Eclipse Cross. Maximum cargo space with the seats folded matters when you move furniture, bikes or bulky gear.
-
The C-HR has 8.1% more cargo space
A modest but measurable lead goes to the C-HR: 25.3 cu ft compared with 23.4 cu ft. Cargo space behind the rear seats is what you use every day for groceries, strollers and luggage.
-
The C-HR has a bigger 14 in touchscreen
The Eclipse Cross lists 8 in; the C-HR comes in at 14 in. That’s not a rounding error. The C-HR’s larger display gives navigation and menus more room.
Design & Size
- Eclipse Cross 179 in × 71.1 in × 66.5 in
- C-HR 177.9 in × 73.6 in × 63.8 in
If you’re worried about fit, relax: either car occupies roughly the same footprint.
Dimensions
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 179 in | 177.9 in |
| Width (no mirrors) | 71.1 in | 73.6 in |
| Height | 66.5 in | 63.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 108.3 in |
Engine & Performance
C-HR leads
If engine & performance is high on your list, the C-HR makes the stronger case by a wide margin. The C-HR gives you 186 hp more power. More power helps with merging, overtaking and climbing hills, especially with passengers and luggage on board. For engine & performance, the C-HR is the one to beat.
Total system output
Eclipse Cross: 152 hp C-HR: 338 hp Power is only part of the story; weight, gearing and torque delivery shape how quick a car feels.
Space & Practicality
C-HR leads
The C-HR dominates the space & practicality section, and the gaps are large enough to matter in daily use. The C-HR delivers 19% more maximum cargo space. Check the shape of the load floor too: a flat floor can matter as much as the number. In short, the C-HR is the better-equipped car for space & practicality.
Cargo (seats folded)
Eclipse Cross: 50.1 cu ft C-HR: 59.5 cu ft The C-HR can swallow more with the seats down, which makes it more versatile for occasional big loads.
Cargo (behind rear seats)
Eclipse Cross: 23.4 cu ft C-HR: 25.3 cu ft Cargo figures are measured in different ways by different makers, so small gaps may not show in practice.
Off-road & Towing
Too close to call
In the off-road & towing category, the Eclipse Cross and the C-HR land in almost the same place. Both cover off-road & towing well enough that other priorities should break the tie.
Safety & Tech
C-HR leads
On safety & tech, the difference is modest, and it favors the C-HR. The C-HR pulls ahead with a bigger 14 in touchscreen. Screen size isn’t everything (physical controls and software speed matter too), but bigger is easier to read. For anyone who cares most about safety & tech, the C-HR is the safer choice.
Largest touchscreen
Eclipse Cross: 8 in C-HR: 14 in A bigger touchscreen makes maps and phone mirroring easier to read at a glance.
Full Specifications
Engine & Performance
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Powertrain | Gas | Battery electric |
| Engine | 1.5L turbo I4 | Dual electric motors, 74.7 kWh battery |
| Total system output | 152 hp | 338 hp (winner) Most powerful in class |
| Torque | 184 lb-ft | N/A (not specified) |
| Transmission | CVT | Single-speed |
| Drivetrain | AWD (S-AWC) | AWD |
Fuel Economy & Range
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel economy (combined)EPA estimate where available | 26 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Fuel economy (city) | 25 mpg | N/A (not specified) |
| Fuel economy (highway) | 28 mpg Thirstiest on the highway | N/A (not specified) |
| Electric range | N/A (not specified) | 287 mi Shortest electric range |
| Fuel tank | 15.8 gal | N/A (not specified) |
Space & Practicality
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo (behind rear seats) | 23.4 cu ft | 25.3 cu ft (winner) |
| Cargo (seats folded) | 50.1 cu ft | 59.5 cu ft (winner) |
Off-road & Towing
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | N/A (not specified) |
| AWD / 4WD available | Yes | Yes |
Safety & Tech
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Largest touchscreen | 8 in | 14 in (winner) |
| Basic warranty | 5 yr / 60,000 mi | 3 yr / 36,000 mi |
Dimensions
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 179 in | 177.9 in |
| Width (no mirrors) | 71.1 in | 73.6 in |
| Height | 66.5 in | 63.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 108.3 in |
Price
| Spec | Eclipse Cross | C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | $27,695 (winner) | $37,000 Priciest in class |
“N/A” means the manufacturer does not specify the value or we could not confirm it. Figures marked “manufacturer rating” are the maker’s own claims, not our measurements.
Price & Value
This is not a small price difference: $9,305, or 34%, separates the two launch prices. Paying $9,305 extra for the C-HR means getting 186 hp more power and 19% more maximum cargo space.
All prices are official US launch prices, last checked launch. Actual prices at stores may differ.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Eclipse Cross if…
- you don’t need the extras that cost $9,305 more
- you trust Mitsubishi and want to keep things familiar
Choose the C-HR if…
- you want more power (338 hp vs 152 hp)
- you move bulky items now and then (59.5 cu ft vs 50.1 cu ft maximum cargo)
- you haul strollers, luggage or sports gear every week (25.3 cu ft vs 23.4 cu ft)
- you want the bigger touchscreen (14 in vs 8 in)
Also Compared
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for most people, the Eclipse Cross or the C-HR?
For most people, the C-HR is the stronger choice, unless you’d rather keep $9,305 for something else.
Is the Eclipse Cross bigger than the C-HR?
They’re practically the same size. The difference between the Eclipse Cross and the C-HR is too small to matter.
Is the Eclipse Cross cheaper than the C-HR?
The Eclipse Cross is the cheaper option, launching at $9,305 less than the C-HR (launch prices as of launch).
Executive Summary
Cross-brand comparisons are where I find the real differences in philosophy, and the Eclipse Cross versus the C-HR shows that nicely. The biggest reason I lean toward the C-HR is simple: it has 186 hp more power. Then there’s 19% more maximum cargo space, another point for the C-HR.
Put simply, the Eclipse Cross suits people who care about price, while the C-HR suits people who put engine & performance first.
My pick: the C-HR, with one exception: if the extra $9,305 would stretch your budget, go for the Eclipse Cross.
Personal opinion based on the data above. Your priorities may differ.